Ahn, W.K. (1998). Why are different feature central for natural kinds and artefacts? The role of causal status in determining feature centrality. Cognition, 69, 135-178.
Ahn, W.K., Kalish, C.W., Medin, D.L., & Gelman, S.A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299-352.
Ahn, W.K., Kim, N.S. (2000). The causal status effect in categorization: An overview. In D.L. Medin (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 40 (pp.23-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ahn, W.K., Marsh, J.K., Luhmann, C.C., & Lee, K. (2002). Effect of theory-based feature correlations on typicality judgements. Memory & Cognition, 30, 107-118.
Ahn, W.K., Novick, L.R., & Kim, N.S. (2003). Understanding behavior makes it more normal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 746-752.
Anderson J.R. (1990). The Adaptive Character of Thought. London, Lawrence Erlbaum.
Barsalou, L.W. (1993). Structure, flexibility, and linguistic vagary in concept: manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A.C. Collins, S.E. Gathercole & M.A. Conway (Eds.), Theory of Memory (pp.29-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Barton, M.E., & Komatsu, L.K. (1989). Defining features of natural kinds and artifacts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 433-447.
Bloom, P. (1998). Theories of artefact categorization. Cognition, 66, 87-93.
Bonnefon, J-F (2007). How do individuals solve the doctrinal paradox in collective decisions? An empirical evidence. Psychological Science, 18, 753-755.
Braisby, N., Franks, B., & Hampton, J. (1996). Essentialism, word use and concepts. Cognition, 59, 247-274.
Chaigneau, S.E., & Barsalou, L.W. (in press). The role of function in categories. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum.
Chaigneau, S.E., Barsalou, L.W., & Sloman, S.A. (2004). Assessing the causal structure of function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 601-625.
Cheng, P. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367–405.
Cheng, P., & Novick, L.R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365-382.
Coley, J.D., Hayes, B., Lawson, C., & Moloney, M. (2004). Knowledge, expectations and inductive reasoning within conceptual hierarchies. Cognition, 90, 217-253.
Cordier, F., Dompnier, L., & Ros, C. (submitted). Feature inferences: a matter of causal density?
Cree, G.S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163-201.
Dompnier, L., Cordier, F., Kirsche, L., & Lescop, O. (2006). Quality judgment of manufactured objects. A conceptual network. 26th International Congress of Applied Psychology. July 16-21, Athens, Greece. p. 978.
Gelman, S.A. (1988). The development of induction with natural kind and artefact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 65-95.
Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting and Knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hadjichristidis, C., Sloman, S., Stevenson, R., & Over, D. (2004). Feature centrality and property induction. Cognitive Science, 28, 45-74.
Haslam, N. & Ernst, D. (2002). Essentialist beliefs about mental disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 628-644.
Heit, E. (2000). Properties of inductive reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 569-592.
Heit, E., & Rubinstein, J. (1994). Similarity and property effects in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 411-422.
Hintzman, D.L. (1986). Schema abstraction in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
Hirschfeld, L.A. (2001). On a folk theory of society: Children, evolution, and mental representations of social groups. Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 107-117.
Keil, F.C. (1989). Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, The MIT Press.
Kelemen, C.D. (1999). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241-272.
Kim, S., & Rehder, B. (2007). Causal status, coherence, and essentialized categories. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Lin, E.L., & Murphy, G.L. (2001). Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 2-28.
Luhmann, C.C. & Ahn, W-K. (2005). The meaning and computation of causal power: Comment on Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004). Psychological Review, 3, 685-693.
Malt, B.C., & Smith, E.E. (1984). Correlation properties in natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 250-269.
McDonald, J., Samuels, M., & Rispoli, J. (1996). A hypothesis-assessment model of categorical argument strength. Cognition, 59, 199-217.
McRae, K., Cree, G.S., (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In E.M.E. Forde & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category-Specificity in Brain and Mind (pp.211-249). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
McRae, K., Cree, G.S., Westmacott, R, & De Sa, V.R. (1999). Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 360-373.
Medin, D.L., Lynch, E.B., Coley, J.D., & Atran, S. (1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology, 32, 49-96.
Medin, D.L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp.179-195). Cambridge, University Press.
Medin, D.L., & Schaffer, M.M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
Meunier, B., & Cordier, F. (2009). The biological categorizations made by 4- and 5-year-old children: the role of feature type versus their causal status. Cognitive Development, 24, 34-48.
Murphy, G.L., & Allopenna, P.D. (1994). The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 904-919.
Murphy, G.L., & Medin, D. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
Murphy, G.L., & Spalding, T. (1995). Knowledge, similarity and concept formation. Psychologica Belgica, 35, 127-144.
Murphy, G.L., & Ross, B.H. (2005). The two faces of typicality in category-based induction. Cognition, 95, 175-200.
Murphy, G.L., & Wisniewski, E.J. (1989). Feature correlations in conceptual representations. In G. Tiberghien (Ed.), Advances in Cognitive Science, Vol. 2: Theory and Applications (pp. 23-45). Chischester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
Nisbett, R.E., Krantz, D.H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339-363.
Nosofsky, R.M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorisation relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
Novick, L.R., & Cheng, P.W. (2004). Assessing interactive causal influence. Psychological Review, 111, 455-485.
Osherson, D.N., Smith, E.E., Wilkie, O., Lopez, A., & Shafir, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 185-200.
Pearl J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Perales, J.C., Catena, A., & Maldonado, A. (2004). Inferring non-observed correlations from causal scenarios: The role of causal knowledge. Learning & Motivation, 35, 115-135.
Perales, J.C. & Shanks, D.R. (2008). Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 1482-1494.
Rehder, B. (2003a). Categorization as causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 27, 709-748.
Rehder, B. (2003b). A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1141-1159.
Rehder, B. (2006). When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization. Memory & Cognition, 34, 3-16.
Rehder, B. (2007a). Essentialism as a generative theory of classification. In A. Gopnick & L. Schulz (Eds.) Causal learning : Psychology, philosophy and computation (pp. 190-207). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rehder, B. (2007b). Property generalization as causal reasoning. In Feeney, A., & Heit, E. (Eds.), Inductive reasoning, Experimental, developmental, and computational approaches, pp. 81-113. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rehder, B., & Burnett, RC. (2005). Feature inference and the causal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 264-314.
Rehder, B., & Hastie, R. (2001). Causal knowledge and categories: the effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 323-360.
Rehder, B., & Hastie, R. (2004). Category coherence and category-based property induction. Cognition, 91, 113-153.
Rehder, B., & Kim, S.W. (2006). How causal knowledge affects classification: A generative theory of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 659-683.
Rips, L.J. (1989). Similarity, typicality and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp.21-59). Cambridge, University Press.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192-233.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
Ross, B.H., & Murphy, G.L. (1999). Food for thought: Cross-classification and category. Organization in a complex real-world domain. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 495-553.
Sloman, S.A., Love, B.C., & Ahn, W.K. (1998). Feature centrality and conceptual coherence. Cognitive Science, 22, 189-228.
Strevens, M. (2000). The essentialist aspect of naive theories. Cognition, 74, 149-175.
Waldmann, M.R., & Hagmayer, Y. (2001). Estimating causal strength: the role of structural knowledge and processing effort. Cognition, 82, 27-58.
Yamauchi, T. (2005). Labeling bias and categorical induction: generative aspects of category information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31, 538-553.
Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A.B. (2000). Learning categories composed of varying instances: the effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment. Memory & Cognition, 28, 64-78.